Why recent changes won’t help Facebook

I can’t believe I am actually posting about the changes being made to Facebook. And, more importantly, that I’m going to complain about them. I’m usually of the mindset that the bitching is unnecessary because in two months you will still be checking Facebook freakishly often.I felt the need to write this post because of an interesting article I read yesterday on The Next Web. It’s a short article about what Facebook needs to do in order to start getting users to flock to their new “Subscribe” feature, which, at the time, I knew very little about. I wanted to write a blog discussing some of the key points.

But instead of writing last night, I decided to watch my DVR recording of the Real Housewives of Beverly Hills. It seemed like the best decision at the time!

Fast forward to this morning: I get online this to start writing and what do I find? The entire Facebook landscape has changed overnight. And people are freaking out (duh). And “Subscribes” are the least of their worries.

So after some more thinking (but only 4 hours because I don’t want this post to become completely irrelevant) I’m standing by the opinion I would have given you last night if not for my addiction to trashy reality TV with a few minor tweaks. Facebook’s subscriptions new updates won’t help them beat Google+. And here’s why:

– My main qualm with the latest updates is that they are doing too much, too fast. And they are just trying to become G+, instead of trying to be themselves, but better.

Facebook isn’t focusing on what has made them great – creating personal connections. A Facebook profile is a look into who someone is. Or, at the very least, who they want to be. It’s transparent and honest. And you can find out a whole lot of info from it (have you ever heard of Twitter stalking? I thought not).- Another big issue I have is why? I don’t think G+ is a huge competitor with Facebook – at least not in the form it is now. I personally think G+ is more like Twitter. I find myself spending the time I would usually be on Twitter on G+. I’m still on Facebook just as much.

I don’t want to figure out who subscribe to. I’ve already spent time figuring out who to “follow” on Twitter. And who to “add to circles” on G+. Friending someone or “Liking” a brand has been enough for me. And I don’t want to rate the importance of my friends’ updates, either (Gmail “important” filter much?). Social media has already become overwhelming to people. These changes are just adding to the clutter. And now Facebook is more like Twitter. Is that what anyone wanted? It’s not what I had in mind.

– And lastly, the changes don’t focus on what their users wanted.

I wanted was a way to organize my friends more into groups that I could consume information from quickly and easily. In this day in age, I have actual friends, frenemies, coworkers, parents, grandparents, cousins, bosses and crazy ex-boyfriend stalkers all on Facebook. I don’t want all those groups to see everything I post.

Facebook did address this with the creation of “Lists.” I would have liked to have seen this rolled out first. And alone. Now I can look at my top friends, favorite brands, fashion blogs, and social media experts without getting lost in a bunch of cruddy other content.

Everything else is just “meh” to me. But check back in two months. I’m sure I’ll be singing Facebook’s praises.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s